Monday, August 13, 2012

A generation is growing up with internet pornography

A generation is growing up skewed by internet pornography, court hears, as 12-year-old who raped a schoolgirl is spared jail

A generation of youngsters may be developing a skewed view of sex from pornography, a court has heard, after a 12-year-old schoolboy raped and sexually assaulted a younger girl after copying a hardcore film he watched on the internet.


By Simon Johnson for http://www.telegraph.co.uk May 31, 2012

The case was just the 'tip of the iceberg' and there may be many similar cases throughout the country, lawyers warned.

The High Court in Edinburgh heard the boy, now aged 14, was allowed “unfettered” access to adult websites before forcing a nine-year-old to perform a sex act on him.
Sean Templeton, the boy’s defence counsel, said the case could be “the tip of the iceberg” because pornography is giving a generation of youngsters a “skewed view” of sex.
Judge Lady Smith decided not to detain the teenager but warned him that he should not regard pornography as a “guide” on how to behave sexually.
The appalling details of the case emerged amid growing political debate as to whether the Government should force internet providers to adopt an “opt-in” system.
This means parents would have to remove a default block on watching pornography on their home computers, thereby preventing their offspring accessing adult images.
Mr Templeton told the court that his client’s response to police questions about why he conducted the attack was “temptation” and “to feel grown up”.
“This was an emulation of an adult act witnessed by him at this young age. He was afforded unfettered access to the internet and it has become apparent from a very young age, the age of 12, he was accessing hard-core pornography,” he said.
“This is the tip of the iceberg. Many, many cases throughout the country may not be identified, not reported, not coming to anyone's attention.”
He told the court pornography was discussed by first-year pupils at secondary school, before concluding: “There is a real risk that young people of the current generation of teenagers are growing up with a skewed view of what sex is and sexual activity."
The boy, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, had earlier admitted statutory offences of rape and sexual assault committed between December 1, 2010 and January 31 last year on a Scottish island.
Jane Farquharson, the advocate depute, said the offences came to light after the girl had been complaining of having a sore stomach.
Her mother asked her if something had happened to her and she became hysterical before disclosing the boy’s actions. Police found a 12-year-old friend of the boy who had seen a sex act being carried out.
Mr Templeton said the boy told officers which websites he visited and his lawyers conducted an investigation that found they contained images “reminiscent of the acts carried out by him.”
Sentencing him, Lady Smith referred the case to the children's panel, meaning the boy will be kept under supervision instead of custody.
She said he would receive advice on relationships and sexual development, adding: “You should not and must not regard pornography as any guide at all as to how to behave sexually.


2 comments:

  1. I think an opt-in default on computers is an excellent & obvious first step, but in the case of this young man it sounds like he was in a negligent or abusive home if he already had "unfettered access" to online porn.

    The matter of children (which I would say is anyone who hasn't reached puberty yet) and porn is not one with a one-size-fits-all solution. Ideally parents should be the conduit of information and education on sex, but while parents may know when their child is ready to be informed, the Internet & other mass media do not.

    A young child exposed to erotic material at the point in their life when their brains are beginning to absorb sexual imprinting may find themselves burdened with an obsession for a particular image or idea. Unfortunately, it's not just overtly sexual material that can do this; otherwise innocent material can make just as vivid an imprint if it catches the child at the right moment...and of course there is no way of looking into a child's head to read when that moment will be.

    (And while overt porn is something we should strive to keep out of the view of children, what is to be done about mass media advertising that uses porn-like or at the very least sensually stimulating images to promote products what are wholly unrelated to sex?)

    ReplyDelete
  2. It becomes quite hard to observe what your child do when he/she is in front of the computer or even with their friends using the internet.
    videos pornos

    ReplyDelete